the weird stuff

you know how folks find weird stuff about murders and like how for example, in the president kennedy lincoln analogies, the johnson as the vice president, etc. well, this one is about the map of where beth shorts body was put, just weird things , there is a street called virginia street to the west and north and a block from that but not consectutive, is a west street, and virginia west , beths sister was married in the bailey house to become adrian wests wife, now, virginia west, and the friend of virginia west who was baileys daughter was barbara, and south of the lot is now mlk blvd, but then it was santa barbara ave. and if you look at this same 1947 page of the map of the thomas guide, there is the location of where the house that beth would have lived with her dad in 1943 at 1028 and a half 38 street, or 36 i forgot for the moment, and the point is that i looked for the house twice in the assessor office to check it out, and no record of a place ever being there is in the computer. and also on the same page of the thomas guide are the coliseum and exposition streets, these were both on postcards as the discription of the photo on the cards, these being possibly sent by the killer to the press, and i do think that the postcards and correspondence did come from the killer, not all of it though, also, the degnan street, i forgot to mention that, and there is more, viola norton was a victim in 2 14 1948 the norton street body site, jeanne french was a victim, beth lived with the frenches, the o and r letters in so many names, ora murray, georgette bauerdorff, elizabeth short, sylvia horan, jeanne axford french, dorothy montgomery, and dorothy was also frenches daughter. then the dates, and these things i am getting from the hodel book, even though i disagree with his conclusions and a lot of the other theories in hodels book, its still a very interesting and informative book, just not objective enough and often not correct and or illogical, but still a good book in many many ways, so anyhow, so if you do read it , the guy baron herringer, well, its probably baron herr enger, because in german herr means the word mister, and now, back to the numbers, look in hodels book page 522, dates of murders, 7/27 , 6/17, 7/10,7/17,10/7,8/27. then , there are other ones in the same type of series thing, that work with ten eleven twelve and fourteen, and to me i think there is a way to find out certain things from the dates, such as the work versus free time for the killers, and perps since these are of course not the crimes of one individual only. when the dates are put on the work sheet that is made up of the crimes it helps to separate the ones most likely connected from the not connected. like armand robles, that should not even be included in the list, because its some side effect crime that was done, not relevant to finding the killer, though. and definately not a crime of the killer upon the kid. its ludicrous. it was a prank a young fellow who sent that letter with armand photo or whatever, that is what it was. simple.
now, the hodel book, the page where he compares halves of the body to see if a watch is inside the top and bottom half. the photos, those are not the same half of the body. one is top and one is bottom. its not the same woman in the photo either, but it worked in one big way, that was to have him think it was, brought about the book and this opened up a lot of the research into learning more about a lot of unsolved past homicides. one day i hope the law will change and cases over fifty years still unsolved won't be still private info only for law enforce ment eyes but open to the general public, till then, we soldier on... the gladys kern murder was in no way shape or form done by the killer of beth short. and the letter was not written by the perp of short. its totally from outer space and non objective to have even considered it. my goodness, look at the darn signature, its a letter p or something. this letter is an alibi in case the one who did the crime needs to have it. the killer did this as a hopeful aid, in case he got nailed for the crime. that is my take on it. and it is also bull shit and lies, there was no racketeer and such, the guy is lying to try and bs the alibi, he was simply robbing the lady and new as a criminal and ended up killing her. he dropped stuff when he ran away. one possibility. other possibility, the wit who said he saw two men, they could have been to get something that she had in her purse, for some crime thing, it may have had to do with property , since it was real estate, and they had to kill her. i don't like this one, because there is too much amatuer stuff in the whole thing, the dropping of the whatever on the lawn, the trying to steal her rings, the belt or whatever at the sink, is a staging of whoever did the crime trying to look like a victim instead of a perp, and the sloppiness is because of inexperience and nerves, the letter is written in tiny little print, not bold and sure but like meek and quiet, the initial is there for a reason, so that if the one who may need to use, in his mind this alibi letter, the p letter is not the full name, because it is not his wish to confess and go to jail, but to have his timid alibi in place. it is clear to me. maybe.